[Requests] GeoServices REST API [Secure Dimensions comments]

Pat Cappelaere pat at cappelaere.com
Mon Aug 13 08:27:51 EDT 2012


Requesting a clear definition of REST may not be as helpful as you may think as it will be one more opinion from yet another person or organization.  It would be more appropriate to request user stories and acceptance criteria to be applied across the many services they have defined.  This would be something that could be observed and analyzed to help us determine if this could be applicable to our own user stories.
This would be extremely useful.

On Aug 12, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Andreas Matheus <andreas.matheus at secure-dimensions.de> wrote:

> 1. Evaluator: Andreas Matheus, Secure Dimensions GmbH
> 2. Submission: GeoServices REST API
> 1. Requirement: n/a
> 2. Implementation Specification Section number: n/a
> 3. Criticality: Major
> 4. Comments/justifications for changes: Please remove the word “REST” from the title as it seems to be misleading and irrelevant for this submission .
> The use of the word “REST” in the title of this submission should be postpone until a firm and consensus definition exists within the OGC. But to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case. 
> If not removed, this submission should clearly state what the submitting organizations’ definition of “REST” is and provide a disclaimer that this does not necessarily represent the understanding of the OGC membership: The document 12-054r1 describes in section 6 “Fundamentals of the GeoServices REST API” and in particular in section 6.2 “REST and pragmatic considerations” the approach taken. I find the argumentation incomplete and not substantial enough as an argument for having the word “REST” in the title. I furthermore see it problematic to use a non standard publication as the “helper” for describing “REST” in an OGC implementation standard: “RESTful Web Services Cookbook from Subbu Allamaraju”. Following the “resolvable” reference from the Bibliography section, you find in the abstract a statement about REST: “While the REST design philosophy has captured the imagination of web and enterprise developers alike, using this approach to develop real web services is no picnic.”. As this is maze fully true, I wonder if a more firm statement can be found in this publication. Also, I have heard other publications in this context that are not referenced. Because of a missing definition, I ask the submitters to rewrite section 6.2 and provide a clear definition of “REST” relevant within the context of this submission.
> Andreas
> ==================================
> Secure Dimensions GmbH
> Waxensteinstr. 28, 81377 Munich, Germany
> Managing Director: Andreas Matheus
> Chamber of Commerce Munich: HRB 178441
> Web: http://www.secure-dimensions.com
> Phone: +49 (0)89 38151813
> _______________________________________________
> Requests mailing list
> Requests at lists.opengeospatial.org
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/requests

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/requests/attachments/20120813/fc02803a/attachment.htm>

More information about the Requests mailing list