[Mass-Market-GEO] Fwd: WMS-C tile caching spec

Michael P. Gerlek mpg at lizardtech.com
Mon Aug 11 15:05:35 EDT 2008


You might CC standards at lists.osgeo.org on this thread -- the WMS-C types hang out there.

-mpg

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> mass-market-geo-bounces+mpg=lizardtech.com at lists.opengeospatia
> l.org 
> [mailto:mass-market-geo-bounces+mpg=lizardtech.com at lists.openg
eospatial.org] On Behalf Of Joan Masó
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 7:45 AM
> To: mass-market-geo at lists.opengeospatial.org
> Subject: [Mass-Market-GEO] Fwd: WMS-C tile caching spec
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that there is a problem accessing the draft of
> OCG 07-057r5 Web Map Tiling Service Standard.doc.
> Sorry.
> I have created a temporary page to download it.
> 
> http://www.creaf.uab.es/temp/wmts/
> 
> Please, help as improving it with suggestions or
> corrections.
> 
> Joan Maso
> UAB-CREAF-MiraMon
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joan Masó <joanma747 at gmail.com>
> Date: Aug 10, 2008 8:40 PM
> Subject: Fwd: [Mass-Market-GEO] WMS-C tile caching spec
> To: mass-market-geo at lists.opengeospatial.org
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm an active member of WMS.RWG. We are working on a document
> to define new standard that we call WMTS (OpenGIS Web Map
> Tiling Server Implementation Standard). The whole process
> has been slower that I would like to be and I'm sorry about that
> because some people had lost interest in the project. I'll be 
> very happy
> to get feedback on the document and to comunicate to the group
> any idea you will have or to include corrections you suggest.
> 
> The document is a draft. Do not look at the index, the UML
> models or the XML schemas but the other parts are quite finished.
> I'm working on them as a final steps.
> 
> The link to the last version of the document is:
> http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29089
> (if you have any problem accessing the document I will send
> you directly).
> 
> I also proposed to the group an WMS-C profile for the new WMS
> version copying must of the OSGeo ideas but I did not succeded.
> 
> I'm also worried about how this document could be harmonized
> with OSGEO wiki-standards.
> 
> Joan Masó
> UAB-CREAF-MiraMon
> 
> On 8/10/08, sophia parafina <creta.kano at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The client-side is also important.  Try and find any commercial GIS
> > vendor that supports any of the tiling specs with COTS, I 
> don't think
> > you will find any.  While I don't believe that "if you 
> build it, they
> > will come"  it will would be helpful to vendors how to prioritize
> > support for the the different tile cache specs.  WMS-C needs to move
> > from a discussion paper to a spec.  The Atlanta TC is a month a way,
> > it would be nice to get the ball rolling.
> >
> > sophia
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Gerry Creager 
> <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> wrote:
> > > Mapserver and (I believe) OpenLayers, in the open source 
> community) came
> > > up with WMS tile caching schemes long ago.  We've lagged 
> behind the
> > > power curve.  I suspect it's really time to engage OSGEO 
> more in this
> > > regard.  There are several OSGEO folks who regularly 
> attend TC meetings,
> > > and we might want to encourage a meeting.
> > >
> > > gerry
> > >
> > > Stefan Keller wrote:
> > >> Good question!
> > >>
> > >> -- S.
> > >> P.S. It would also perhaps be worthwhile to explain 
> (especially on the
> > >> OSGEO site) what the relationship is for WMS Tile 
> Caching and this page
> > >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Tile_Map_Service_Specification .
> > >> 2008/8/9 percy <percyd at pdx.edu <mailto:percyd at pdx.edu>>
> > >>
> > >>     Hi, what's the current status of the tile caching 
> spec proposed by
> > >>     OSGEO?
> > >>     http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/WMS_Tile_Caching
> > >>
> > >>     I am giving a talk on optimizations for speedy web 
> delivery in a few
> > >>     days, and it would be nice to know how the OGC is 
> thinking about this
> > >>     currently.
> > >>
> > >>     Any other tile caching schemes or optimizations for 
> large data sets
> > >>     that are in review would be nice to know about as well :-)
> > >>
> > >>     Thanks a bunch,
> > >>     Percy
> > >>
> > >>     --
> > >>     David Percy
> > >>     Geospatial Data Mannager
> > >>     Geology Department
> > >>     Portland State University
> > >>     503-725-3373
> > >>     http://gisgeek.pdx.edu <http://gisgeek.pdx.edu/>
> > >>
> > >>     _______________________________________________
> > >>     Mass-Market-GEO mailing list
> > >>     Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org
> > >>     <mailto:Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org>
> > >>     
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mass-Market-GEO mailing list
> > >> Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org
> > >> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
> > > Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
> > > Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
> > > Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College 
> Station, TX 77843
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mass-Market-GEO mailing list
> > > Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org
> > > https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mass-Market-GEO mailing list
> > Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org
> > https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mass-Market-GEO mailing list
> Mass-Market-GEO at lists.opengeospatial.org
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/mass-market-geo
> 



More information about the Mass-Market-GEO mailing list