[Geopackage] New Blog Post

Jeff Yutzler jeffy at imagemattersllc.com
Fri Dec 16 12:41:37 EST 2016


We deliberately didn't specify this because we didn't want to mandate one
flavor over another. We felt that this could be handled out of band or
through the metadata.

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt <
pepijn at vaneeckhoudt.net> wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> I might have missed it, but there doesn't seem to be any description of
> the geographic location of the sample values.
> Are the pixel values located on grid points or at the grid cell center?
> Have they been point sampled or are they area averages? etc.
> This information is pretty critical to know when interpreting the data and
> interpolating values (evaluating the coverage in topic 6 terminology).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt
>
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 17:42, Jeff Yutzler via Geopackage <geopackage at lists.
> opengeospatial.org> wrote:
>
> I just published a new blog post regarding the new Elevation Extension:
> http://geopackage.blogspot.com/2016/12/elevation-extension-update.html
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> --
> Jeff Yutzler
> Image Matters LLC <http://www.imagemattersllc.com/>
> Mobile: (703) 981-8753
>
>
>


-- 
Jeff Yutzler
Image Matters LLC <http://www.imagemattersllc.com/>
Mobile: (703) 981-8753
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geopackage/attachments/20161216/c56dcf3c/attachment.html>


More information about the Geopackage mailing list