[Geopackage] Website updates & a question
jeffy at imagemattersllc.com
Wed Jun 3 17:22:07 EDT 2015
I'll take care of the 'reference implementation' language. I have to make
another change anyway so I'll put it in the same PR.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Chris Holmes <cholmes at planet.com> wrote:
> Cool, yeah, definitely happy to have it up there, I'd say just remove the
> words 'reference implementation'. I'll try to make a PR if I find some
> time, but the next bit is super busy.
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jeff Yutzler <jeffy at imagemattersllc.com>
>> Thanks for the pull request. Geopackage.org needs more work but every bit
>> helps. The ERDC GeoPackage was developed in conjunction with the GPKG
>> Plugfest  (I'm presenting the engineering report on Monday) and the
>> executable test suite. I don't care what we call the thing but we need to
>> have something up there. Actually the version linked on geopackage.org
>> is out of date . RGi has created a corrected version and I've told Greg
>> to fix it at least three times now. It should take five minutes.
>>  https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=462
>>  https://github.com/opengeospatial/geopackage/issues/96
>> From: Chris Holmes <cholmes at 9eo.org>
>>> To: geopackage at lists.opengeospatial.org
>>> Subject: [Geopackage] Website updates & a question
>>> uwO2jjm64gFeBJ7_o39+4M2ZGHUCqYjhoi3c-Cg at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> Hey, I've been meaning to do this for awhile, but just made a pull
>>> so the 'implementations' listed are more consistent. Focused on just what
>>> version of software supports which parts of geopackage, and linking out.
>>> I may make some more pull requests if I can find some time, on data, and
>>> maybe some small edits on the first paragraph.
>>> One thing I was surprised by is this 'reference implementation' from
>>> I searched the group and didn't find much reference to this. Why is it
>>> called a reference implementation? Was it made in conjunction with a test
>>> suite? It also looks like it only implements tiles? To me it seems like a
>>> reference implementation should be complete.
>>> Unless someone has a compelling reason I'd like to remove 'reference
>>> implementation' from the language around it, unless it's developed in
>>> tandem with an OGC test suite.
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> End of Geopackage Digest, Vol 12, Issue 9
>> Jeff Yutzler
>> Image Matters LLC
>> Mobile: (703) 981-8753
>> Office: (703) 428-6731
Image Matters LLC
Mobile: (703) 981-8753
Office: (703) 428-6731
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Geopackage