[Geopackage] Website updates & a question

Chris Holmes cholmes at planet.com
Tue Jun 2 11:14:29 EDT 2015


Cool, yeah, definitely happy to have it up there, I'd say just remove the
words 'reference implementation'. I'll try to make a PR if I find some
time, but the next bit is super busy.

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jeff Yutzler <jeffy at imagemattersllc.com>
wrote:

> Chris,
> Thanks for the pull request. Geopackage.org needs more work but every bit
> helps. The ERDC GeoPackage was developed in conjunction with the GPKG
> Plugfest [1] (I'm presenting the engineering report on Monday) and the
> executable test suite. I don't care what we call the thing but we need to
> have something up there. Actually the version linked on geopackage.org is
> out of date [2]. RGi has created a corrected version and I've told Greg to
> fix it at least three times now. It should take five minutes.
> -Jeff
>
> [1] https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=462
> [2] https://github.com/opengeospatial/geopackage/issues/96
>
> From: Chris Holmes <cholmes at 9eo.org>
>> To: geopackage at lists.opengeospatial.org
>> Subject: [Geopackage] Website updates & a question
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAOmbnMasp1=
>> uwO2jjm64gFeBJ7_o39+4M2ZGHUCqYjhoi3c-Cg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hey, I've been meaning to do this for awhile, but just made a pull request
>> so the 'implementations' listed are more consistent. Focused on just what
>> version of software supports which parts of geopackage, and linking out.
>>
>> https://github.com/opengeospatial/geopackage/pull/100
>>
>> I may make some more pull requests if I can find some time, on data, and
>> maybe some small edits on the first paragraph.
>>
>> One thing I was surprised by is this 'reference implementation' from ERDC.
>> I searched the group and didn't find much reference to this. Why is it
>> called a reference implementation? Was it made in conjunction with a test
>> suite? It also looks like it only implements tiles? To me it seems like a
>> reference implementation should be complete.
>>
>> Unless someone has a compelling reason I'd like to remove 'reference
>> implementation' from the language around it, unless it's developed in
>> tandem with an OGC test suite.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geopackage/attachments/20150530/01eee9ca/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> End of Geopackage Digest, Vol 12, Issue 9
>> *****************************************
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Yutzler
> Image Matters LLC
> Mobile: (703) 981-8753
> Office: (703) 428-6731
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/geopackage/attachments/20150602/61dbc507/attachment.html>


More information about the Geopackage mailing list