[CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site

Robin Houtmeyers Robin.Houtmeyers at luciad.com
Fri Jun 20 16:56:07 EDT 2014


Hi Richard,

yes, the 'wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6' behaves as expected; it passes. The URL from that test is http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadMapOGC/wms111?&WiDtH=168&ReQuEsT=GetMap&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&SrS=EPSG:4326&HeIgHt=96&StYlEs=&LaYeRs=cite:Lakes,NonExistant which seems to give the same result as I got for the other test.

Thanks,
Robin

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Richard Martell" <rmartell at galdosinc.com>
Aan: "Robin Houtmeyers" <Robin.Houtmeyers at luciad.com>, cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
Verzonden: Vrijdag 20 juni 2014 21:41:35
Onderwerp: Re: [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site

Hi Robin,

Does the 'wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6' test behave as expected? It also looks for an exception report. The difference here is that 
a response parser is not explicitly specified for the service request.

If *-layers-6 looks ok, then it may be an issue with the response parser.

--
Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: CITE-Forum [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org] On Behalf Of Robin Houtmeyers
Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 06:54
To: cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
Subject: [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site

Hi,

while testing with the latest WMS 1.1.1 test revision available in the beta web site (r6), I encountered the following issue with our WMS:

Test wms:wmsops-getmap-params-layers-5 fails because it expects that the result is an XML service exception report, in which /ServiceExceptionReport/ServiceException[@code="LayerNotDefined"] exists. 

However, this seems exactly the case when I execute the request generated by the test: http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadMapOGC/wms111?&SrS=EPSG:4326&LaYeRs=NonExistant&StYlEs=&ReQuEsT=GetMap&HeIgHt=96&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&WiDtH=168

Could it be that there is a test issue for this case?

Best regards,
Robin Houtmeyers
Luciad

_______________________________________________
CITE-Forum mailing list
CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list