[CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site

Luis Bermudez lbermudez at opengeospatial.org
Wed Dec 3 15:57:38 EST 2014


Hi Robin

r8 will be soon in the beta web site. They are still some issues open that we wanted to close before doing the release. 


- Luis

---------------------------------------------------
Luis Bermudez, Ph.D.
Director Compliance Program
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
The OGC: Making Location Count

Skype: bermudez_luis
Twitter: @berdez
Tel: +1 301 760 7323
http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez




On Dec 3, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Robin Houtmeyers <Robin.Houtmeyers at luciad.com> wrote:

> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> I tested via http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine. I could not find r8 on http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine or http://cite.opengeospatial.org/te2/.
> 
> Best regards,
> Robin
> 
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: goerke at lat-lon.de
> Aan: "Robin Houtmeyers" <Robin.Houtmeyers at luciad.com>
> Cc: "Sebastian Goerke" <goerke at lat-lon.de>, cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
> Verzonden: Woensdag 3 december 2014 15:52:58
> Onderwerp: Re: [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site
> 
> Hi Robin,
> 
> against which testing facility are you testing? I think within r8 of the
> WMS 1.1.1 testsuite, this issue is fixed.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Sebastian
> 
>> Hi Sebastian,
>> 
>> after fixing the HTTP status code handling at our side, I retested the
>> software against the latest revision of the WMS 1.1.1 test suite, r7, but
>> both tests still fail.
>> 
>> More specifically:
>> 
>> (1) Test wmsops-getmap-params-layers-5 uses the following request
>> 
>> http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadFusionOGC2013/wms111?&SrS=EPSG:4326&LaYeRs=NonExistant&StYlEs=&ReQuEsT=GetMap&HeIgHt=96&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&WiDtH=168
>> 
>> to check whether a valid service exception report is returned.
>> This seems to be the case to us:
>> - /ServiceExceptionReport/ServiceException[@code="LayerNotDefined"] exists
>> - the HTTP status code is 404
>> 
>> (2) Test wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6 uses the following request
>> 
>> http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadFusionOGC2013/wms111?&WiDtH=168&ReQuEsT=GetMap&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&SrS=EPSG:4326&HeIgHt=96&StYlEs=&LaYeRs=cite:Lakes,NonExistant
>> 
>> to test similar behavior. Again, the result seems ok:
>> - /ServiceExceptionReport/ServiceException[@code="LayerNotDefined"] exists
>> - the HTTP status code is 404
>> 
>> Could it be that there is still a test issue?
>> I will also continue to investigate at our side.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Robin Houtmeyers
>> Luciad
>> 
>> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
>> Van: "Sebastian Goerke" <goerke at lat-lon.de>
>> Aan: cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
>> Verzonden: Maandag 23 juni 2014 11:16:08
>> Onderwerp: Re: [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Hi Robin,
>> 
>> I checked with your service. Yes, there is an issue with the tests,
>> but it is one with wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6 and not with
>> wmsops-getmap-params-layers-5 as you expected. Test 5 makes use of the
>> HTTPParser of Teamengine and discloses that the ServiceException your
>> service is throwing has a HTTP Status code of 200, which is obviously
>> wrong for a service exception. Test 6 is not using the HTTP parser
>> currently, so I have updated this test on trunk (revision 6582).
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Sebastian
>> 
>> - --
>> l a t / l o n  GmbH
>> Aennchenstrasse 19               53177 Bonn, Germany
>> phone ++49 +228 18496-0          fax ++49 +228 18496-29
>> http://www.lat-lon.de            http://www.deegree.org
>> 
>> Am 20.06.2014 22:56, schrieb Robin Houtmeyers:
>>> Hi Richard,
>>> 
>>> yes, the 'wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6' behaves as expected; it
>>> passes. The URL from that test is
>>> http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadMapOGC/wms111?&WiDtH=168&ReQuEsT=GetMap&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&SrS=EPSG:4326&HeIgHt=96&StYlEs=&LaYeRs=cite:Lakes,NonExistant
>>> which seems to give the same result as I got for the other test.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Robin
>>> 
>>> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Richard Martell"
>>> <rmartell at galdosinc.com> Aan: "Robin Houtmeyers"
>>> <Robin.Houtmeyers at luciad.com>, cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
>>> Verzonden: Vrijdag 20 juni 2014 21:41:35 Onderwerp: Re:
>>> [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1 r6 test issue in the beta web site
>>> 
>>> Hi Robin,
>>> 
>>> Does the 'wmsops-getmap-params-layers-6' test behave as expected?
>>> It also looks for an exception report. The difference here is that
>>> a response parser is not explicitly specified for the service
>>> request.
>>> 
>>> If *-layers-6 looks ok, then it may be an issue with the response
>>> parser.
>>> 
>>> -- Richard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- From: CITE-Forum
>>> [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Robin Houtmeyers Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 06:54 To:
>>> cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org Subject: [CITE-Forum] WMS 1.1.1
>>> r6 test issue in the beta web site
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> while testing with the latest WMS 1.1.1 test revision available in
>>> the beta web site (r6), I encountered the following issue with our
>>> WMS:
>>> 
>>> Test wms:wmsops-getmap-params-layers-5 fails because it expects
>>> that the result is an XML service exception report, in which
>>> /ServiceExceptionReport/ServiceException[@code="LayerNotDefined"]
>>> exists.
>>> 
>>> However, this seems exactly the case when I execute the request
>>> generated by the test:
>>> http://demo.luciad.com:8080/LuciadMapOGC/wms111?&SrS=EPSG:4326&LaYeRs=NonExistant&StYlEs=&ReQuEsT=GetMap&HeIgHt=96&FoRmAt=image/jpeg&VeRsIoN=1.1.1&BbOx=-0.0042,-0.0024,0.0042,0.0024&WiDtH=168
>>> 
>>> Could it be that there is a test issue for this case?
>>> 
>>> Best regards, Robin Houtmeyers Luciad
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ CITE-Forum mailing
>>> list CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
>>> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum
>>> _______________________________________________ CITE-Forum mailing
>>> list CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
>>> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum
>>> 
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>> 
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlOn8FgACgkQq1hDh4aJykKCHACeJc87LgICn+W7SjYv3lYk5SJT
>> O8UAnizYxsIPPZmdpDBGpzqJuOcTDQF/
>> =AlWj
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> CITE-Forum mailing list
>> CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
>> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CITE-Forum mailing list
> CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/attachments/20141203/35a086c8/attachment.html>


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list