[CITE-Forum] Changes in WMS 1.1 dtd

Luis Bermudez lbermudez at opengeospatial.org
Thu Dec 5 17:19:56 EST 2013


Hi Andrea

> When is this version of the tests going to become "official"?

A new revision of the test becomes official when 
- the test is in beta for  others to exercise
- the submitters of the issues and the test lead are in agreement
- in the CITE forum no one complaints
- reference implementations pass the test

> Are server implementors 
> supposed to make the location configurable, in order to pass tests of both versions (current and future?)

Good question. This is something that requires more discussion.

- Luis

---------------------------------------------------
Luis Bermudez, Ph.D.
Director Compliance Program
Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
The OGC: Making Location Count

Skype: bermudez_luis
Twitter: @berdez
Tel: +1 301 760 7323
http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez




On Dec 1, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Andrea Aime <andrea.aime at geo-solutions.it> wrote:

> Hi,
> looking at the WMS 1.1 tests I've noticed this recent change:
> 
> diff --git a/wms/1.1.1/trunk/ctl/wms.xml b/wms/1.1.1/trunk/ctl/wms.xml
> index 452ae01..1f3adb0 100644
> --- a/wms/1.1.1/trunk/ctl/wms.xml
> +++ b/wms/1.1.1/trunk/ctl/wms.xml
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>              <documentlocations xmlns="">
>                 <parm>
>                    <name>http://www.galdosinc.com/xml/properties/dtdLocation/WMT_MS_Capabilities</name>
> -                  <value>http://schemas.opengis.net/wms/1.1.1/WMS_MS_Capabilities.dtd</value>
> +                  <value>http://schemas.opengis.net/wms/1.1.1/capabilities_1_1_1.dtd</value>^M
>                 </parm>
>              </documentlocations>
>           </with-param>
> 
> With comment:
> Configure GMLValidatingParser with DTD at http://schemas.opengis.net/wms/1.1.1/capabilities_1_1_1.dtd (includes all Extent attributes are documented in C.3).
> 
> The way the change is setup means that a server that was passing the test before (because it
> was using WMS_MS_Capabilities.dtd) won't be able to pass the test anymore, because the
> content of the two files is not the same.
> 
> When is this version of the tests going to become "official"? Are server implementors 
> supposed to make the location configurable, in order to pass tests of both versions (current and future?)
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 
> -- 
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information.
> ==
> 
> Ing. Andrea Aime 
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
> 
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39  339 8844549
> 
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CITE-Forum mailing list
> CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/attachments/20131205/3b2582d8/attachment.html>


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list