[CITE-Forum] Testing Locally

Richard Martell rmartell at galdosinc.com
Fri Apr 26 17:05:11 EDT 2013


Baris,


Regarding #2 below, you'll see from the svn log in the OGC repository that 
there were no updates to GetFeature-POST-spatialops.xml in March 2011.


>svn log GetFeature-POST-spatialops.xml

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r5317 | rmartell | 2013-02-09 07:15:30 -0800 (Sat, 09 Feb 2013) | 1 line

Fixed Schematron schema classpath references.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r4998 | sgoerke | 2012-11-20 03:01:05 -0800 (Tue, 20 Nov 2012) | 4 lines

update test data to correct EPSG:4326 urn encoded writing.
fix issue 669 regarding wrong urn encoded writing of EPSG:32629 and EPSG:32631


------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3728 | aschmitz | 2011-01-14 02:29:02 -0800 (Fri, 14 Jan 2011) | 2 lines

removed test 204.4, see issue #572

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3450 | aschmitz | 2010-08-03 00:43:10 -0700 (Tue, 03 Aug 2010) | 2 lines

fix for issue #551



There don't appear to be any relevant bug reports for WFS 1.1 in the 
CITE issue tracker at <http://cite.opengeospatial.org/issues>.

Perhaps you could add one if I overlooked it. 


--
Richard


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial
> .org 
> [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.openge
> ospatial.org] On Behalf Of BARIS KAZAR
> Sent: Friday, 26 April, 2013 08:27
> To: cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
> Subject: Re: [CITE-Forum] Testing Locally
> 
> Hi,-
> May i ask the following problems with TeamEngine 4.0 tests?
> 
> 1)
> I think any exception for the following tests is ok, right?
> Why are the tests forcing to have InvalidParameterValue exception?
> I think the CTL codes are the same but previously TeamEngine 
> did not enforce this.
> wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc101.3
> wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc202.1
> wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc203.3
> 
> 2)
> Why is the whitespace at the end of the following 
> wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc209.1.test not ignored?
> Please check out 
> http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/2011-Marc
> h/000463.html
> It seems this fix is not in TeamEngine 4.0 distribution
> <message id="d207e12133_1"><![CDATA[FAILURE: Expected gml:pos 
> of "34.94 -10.52" (found: 34.94 -10.52 ).]]></message>
> 
> 3)
> We still have the following issue: multiple values in gml:id 
> attribute of ogc:GmlObjectId  element in 
> wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc33.1 test.
> 
> If desired, i can post these in a separate thread.
> 
> Best regards
> baris
> 
> On 4/26/2013 9:12 AM, BARIS KAZAR wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,-
> > Thanks, when will TeamEngine 4.0 be operational?
> > i also find some issues with some of the GetFeature GET KVP 
> tests, i am still trying to determine the problem.
> > I tested some of them outside the TeamEngine and they 
> executed fine and they were working fine with Revision 3972 
> (TeamEngine 3.x).
> >
> > Best regards
> > baris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CITE-Forum mailing list
> CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum
> 


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list