[CITE-Forum] WPS 1.0.0 r1 tests

Benjamin Proß b.pross at 52north.org
Thu Apr 25 03:07:35 EDT 2013


Thanks, guys. I submitted a bug report for this issue.

Cheers,

Benjamin

Am 24.04.2013 22:50, schrieb Luis E. Bermudez:
> Hi Richard,
>
> The category is there. Is not showing because we have no issues 
> related to it. In the process of entering the issue you will see the 
> option.
>
> ---
> Luis
> http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/lbermudez
> The OGC: Making Location Count
>
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Richard Martell wrote:
>
>> Benjamin,
>>
>>
>> This is a bug in the script in that it doesn't allow for multiple 
>> exceptions
>> (1..*) appearing in the report--this is permitted as you pointed out.
>>
>> <http://schemas.opengis.net/ows/1.1.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd>
>>
>>
>> And one cannot assume that the exceptions are ordered in any manner.
>> Please submit a bug report at <http://cite.opengeospatial.org/issues>*.
>>
>>
>> * I see there's no entry for WPS 1.0 in the "Category" field. Luis,
>> can you add it please?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: 
>> cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org 
>> <mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org> 
>> [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org 
>> <mailto:galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial.org>] On Behalf Of 
>> Benjamin Proß
>> Sent: Tuesday, 23 April, 2013 08:08
>> To: CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org 
>> <mailto:CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org>
>> Subject: [CITE-Forum] WPS 1.0.0 r1 tests
>>
>>
>> List,
>>
>> While testing our WPS 1.0.0 implementation, we came across the 
>> following (possible) issue:
>>
>> The ExceptionReport responses of our WPS contain more than one 
>> Exception element and therefore also more than one exceptionCode 
>> attribute.
>> We think, this is correct based on Table 57 in OGC 05-007r7 and 
>> section 8.2 in OGC 06-121r3.
>> The test now seems to concatenate the exceptionCodes and then fails 
>> because this doesn't match the expected code, e.g. 
>> "MissingParameterValue".
>> Shouldn't it be tested, whether the concatenation contains the 
>> expected exceptionCode instead?
>> Please find attached a test log of the 
>> OWS.GetCapabilities-Exceptions.1 test. This issue would affect 
>> several more tests, though.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Benjamin
>>
>> -- 
>> Benjamin Proß
>> 52°North Initiative for Geospatial Open Source Software GmbH
>> Martin-Luther-King-Weg 24
>> E-Mail: b.pross at 52north.org <mailto:b.pross at 52north.org>
>> Fon: +49-(0)-251-396371-42
>> Fax: +49-(0)-251-396371-11
>> http://www.52north.org
>> General Managers: Dr. Albert Remke, Dr. Andreas Wytzisk
>> Local Court Muenster HRB 10849
>>
>>
>


-- 
Benjamin Proß
52°North Initiative for Geospatial Open Source Software GmbH
Martin-Luther-King-Weg 24
E-Mail: b.pross at 52north.org
Fon: +49-(0)-251--396371-42
Fax: +49-(0)-251--396371-11
http://www.52north.org
General Managers: Dr. Albert Remke, Dr. Andreas Wytzisk
Local Court Muenster HRB 10849

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/attachments/20130425/c4db4558/attachment.htm>


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list