[CITE-Forum] Query regarding WFS 1.1.0 -GetGMLObject

Sebastian Goerke goerke at lat-lon.de
Fri Apr 12 04:13:37 EDT 2013

Hash: SHA1


from 14.7.4 GetGmlObject operation within the WFS 1.1.0 specification
you can geht, that TRAVERSEXLINKDEPTH paramter is mandatory for
GetGmlObject requests. I interpret this as an implicit requirement to
implement XLinks.

Additionally, 10 GetGmlObject operation of the spec says:

GetGmlObject request provides the interface through which a WFS can be
asked to traverse and resolve XLinks to the features and elements it

So, from my side, XLink support is mandatory for GetGmlObject.

Best Regards

Sebastian Goerke

- -- 
l a t / l o n  GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19               53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 18496-0          fax ++49 +228 18496-29
http://www.lat-lon.de            http://www.deegree.org

Am 12.04.2013 09:26, schrieb Meenakshi Gupta:
> Hi All, I have to implement WFS 1.1.0 operations in my code. I want
> to know for implementing GetGMLObject operation is implementation
> of Xlinks mandatory?
> Thanks in advance. =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The
> information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to
> it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review,
> distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in
> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and
> permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you
> _______________________________________________ CITE-Forum mailing
> list CITE-Forum at lists.opengeospatial.org 
> https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cite-forum
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/


More information about the CITE-Forum mailing list