[CITE-Forum] [CITE.SC] wfs 1.1.0 beta engine tests updated - Please review2010-09-30
jdeolive at opengeo.org
Tue Oct 5 12:26:59 EDT 2010
Thanks for the info Richard. A few questions inline.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Richard Martell <rmartell at galdosinc.com>wrote:
> The OGC URN namespace identifier was approved a couple of years ago:
> Hmmm... when the original CITE work was done the "old" identifier was
required. Was there any sort of deprecation cycle? Or when the initial wfs
1.1 cite tests were done was the spec not considered final and subject to
change? Apologies, i am not too familiar with the spec/cite
practices. Should perhaps the cite tests allow for both?
> About the missing @srsDimension, it may have been omitted as redundant,
> since it's specified by the CRS. Note that if srsName is absent,
> srsDimension must also be absent:
> "When the srsName attribute is omitted, this attribute shall be omitted."
> I don't quite understand. If the srsName is omitted this attribute should
be omitted... ok i understand that. But if the srsName is present is this
saying that this attribute is redundant because the dimension can be
inferred from the srsName? What is the point of it then in the schema?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial
> > .org
> > [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell <cite-forum-bounces%2Brmartell>=
> galdosinc.com at lists.openge
> ospatial.org] On Behalf Of Justin Deoliveira
> > Sent: Monday, 04 October, 2010 15:02
> > To: Riche, Antoine (GE Energy)
> > Cc: Kevin Stegemoller; cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org; CITE SC
> > Subject: Re: [CITE-Forum] [CITE.SC] wfs 1.1.0 beta engine
> > tests updated - Please review2010-09-30
> > I just ran the tests against geoserver and did not make it
> > out of the readiness tests :(
> > Two problems from what I can tell. The first.
> > Error 1: Line 192 - assertion failed:
> > DefaultSRS value is not a valid URI (invalid
> > scheme name or URN namespace identifier).
> > The DefaultSRS is urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326.
> > The prefix is apparently now "urn:ogc:def:crs:"? I know this
> > has been debated a lot but when did it officially change?
> > Second problem is validation errors like:
> > cvc-complex-type.3.2.2: Attribute 'srsDimension' is not
> > allowed to appear in element 'gml:Point'
> > Apparently the gmlsf.xsd schema does not include srsDimension
> > as an allowable attribute? Only srsName? Was this intentional
> > or an oversight?
> > Thanks all.
> > -Justin
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CITE-Forum