[CITE-Forum] [CITE.SC] wfs 1.1.0 beta engine tests updated - Please review2010-09-30
rmartell at galdosinc.com
Tue Oct 5 12:13:45 EDT 2010
The OGC URN namespace identifier was approved a couple of years ago:
About the missing @srsDimension, it may have been omitted as redundant,
since it's specified by the CRS. Note that if srsName is absent,
srsDimension must also be absent:
"When the srsName attribute is omitted, this attribute shall be omitted."
> -----Original Message-----
> cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.opengeospatial
> [mailto:cite-forum-bounces+rmartell=galdosinc.com at lists.openge
ospatial.org] On Behalf Of Justin Deoliveira
> Sent: Monday, 04 October, 2010 15:02
> To: Riche, Antoine (GE Energy)
> Cc: Kevin Stegemoller; cite-forum at lists.opengeospatial.org; CITE SC
> Subject: Re: [CITE-Forum] [CITE.SC] wfs 1.1.0 beta engine
> tests updated - Please review2010-09-30
> I just ran the tests against geoserver and did not make it
> out of the readiness tests :(
> Two problems from what I can tell. The first.
> Error 1: Line 192 - assertion failed:
> DefaultSRS value is not a valid URI (invalid
> scheme name or URN namespace identifier).
> The DefaultSRS is urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326.
> The prefix is apparently now "urn:ogc:def:crs:"? I know this
> has been debated a lot but when did it officially change?
> Second problem is validation errors like:
> cvc-complex-type.3.2.2: Attribute 'srsDimension' is not
> allowed to appear in element 'gml:Point'
> Apparently the gmlsf.xsd schema does not include srsDimension
> as an allowable attribute? Only srsName? Was this intentional
> or an oversight?
> Thanks all.
More information about the CITE-Forum