[CITE-Forum] wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc205.2 test

[Andreas Schmitz]

Richard Martell wrote:

Hi,

> I agree with Baris--an exception report should be returned in this 
> case (with status code 400), indicating that sf:pointProperty is 
> undefined for sf:AggregateGeoFeature.

why do you think this would be correct? The filter encoding spec's
PropertyName element is actually just a subset of XPath, so I believe
the interpretation should be based on xpath as well. Like I said before,
there are quite a few tests in the current suite that confirm this
interpretation. Also, error code 400 is not mentioned anywhere in the
1.1.0 spec.

Best regards, Andreas
-- 
l a t / l o n  GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19               53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 18496-0          fax ++49 +228 18496-29
http://www.lat-lon.de            http://www.deegree.org

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
                    deegree day 2010
             http://deegreeday.deegree.org
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/attachments/20101115/e7da3002/attachment.pgp>